Pinoy Blog Machine (Beta)

SENSORY PROCESSING DISORDER: Advanced Research and Innovative Practice

When & Where
November 7 & 8, 2008 – International Symposium

November 6 – Pre-Conference Institute

Hyatt Regency Boston
One Avenue de Lafayette
Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Start planning now to attend the SPD Foundation’s 7th International Symposium in Boston. The Symposium will feature two information-packed days of presentations by top researchers and leading clinicians preceded by a first-ever day-long Pre-Conference Institute showcasing new assessment tools.

Program highlights:

• Four keynote presentations spotlighting the latest SPD research
• One keynote presentation on the status of the DSM-V initiative
• Separate break-out tracks for research and treatment A pre-conference day dedicated to new assessment tools

Keynote and featured speakers:

• Lucy Jane Miller, PhD, OTR, Founder and executive director, SPD Foundation
• David L. Pauls, PhD, Director of Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit in the Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School
• John J. Foxe, PhD, Professor and program director, Cognitive Neuroscience Department, City College of the City University of New York, and the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
• Alice S. Carter, Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts
• Margaret L. Bauman, MD, Medical Director, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital Ladders, and Harvard Medical School

For more information, click here.

Here is the first 2008 U.S. presidential debate between Republican nominee Sen. John McCain and Democrat nominee Sen. Barack Obama. The debate focused on issues related to foreign policy and national security, including the global financial crisis. It is more than one hour and 30 minutes, so make sure you have the time and good Internet connection to watch it.

PinoyPress also reports the two candidates’ views on political, economic, and social issues between U.S. and Asia.

Speaking of the financial crisis, Jon Friedman of MarketWatch criticizes the press for its “wimpy” coverage of the economic meltdown.

Media shouldn’t shy away from explosive language
Commentary: Mealy-mouthed financial reporters should tell it like it is
By Jon Friedman, MarketWatch
Sept. 26, 2008

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Over the past few, stunning weeks, the reporters covering the apparent collapse of capitalism have tried mightily to be prudent and proper. In this extraordinary period, however, I’d prefer bluntness and brutal truth.

This is no time for journalists to be hedging their bets and falling back on imprecise, sugar-coated language.

The Wall Street media may want to dispel notions that they’re merely trying to capitalize on a scary time and sell newspapers, increase their Web clicks and raise television ratings. Remember, journalists were skewered after the tech bubble burst in 2000. The public blamed the media for acting as cheerleaders for the fragile Internet stocks.

But these days, the media are taking their good intentions too far. They’re failing to describe accurately the bloodbath (and, you bet, “bloodbath” is an acceptable word, too).

Read more here.

Technology has allowed the rise of blogging and citizen journalism, and at the same time, helped produce the current 24/7 news cycle and multimedia journalism practice among media organizations. News gathering has become increasingly complex as well, offering challenges to journalists in covering events and issues. As citizens shift to the online medium both to consume and produce information, decreasing circulation figures and ratings have sparked fears of the demise of the media as we know it.

In these interesting times, journalists should review the values of the profession–why we are here in the first place. What is journalism’s function and purpose in society? What are the obligations and responsibilities of journalists?

Citizens too have rights and responsibilities when it comes to news; rights and responsibilities which have become specially pronounced since the advent of blogging and citizen journalism.

Written by respected American journalists Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect, comprehensively discusses the essential elements that define journalism and the role of press in society. It also discusses the role of citizens in newsmaking in the Internet age.

“The Elements of Journalism delineates the core principles shared by journalists across media, even across cultures. These principles flow from the essential function news plays in people’s lives,” the Committee of Concerned Journalists said. A new edition, published April 2007, includes a 10th principle: the rights and responsibilities of citizens. This 10 principles flows from the “new power conveyed by technology to the citizen as a consumer and editor of their own news and information.”

What are the Elements of Journalism?
From The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect
Source: Committee of Concerned Journalists

1. Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth.

2. Its first loyalty is to citizens.

3. Its essence is a discipline of verification.

4. Its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover.

5. It must serve as an independent monitor of power.

6. It must provide a forum for public criticism and compromise.

7. It must strive to make the significant interesting and relevant.

8. It must keep the news comprehensive and proportional.

9. Its practitioners have an obligation to exercise their personal conscience.

10. Citizens, too, have rights and responsibilities when it comes to the news.

The book’s introduction, which explains how the book got started, can be read here.

Debbie Uy, a colleague and MA classmate who currently serves as readers’ advocate of the Davao-based Mindanao Insider, discussed these elements in two successive column pieces. (First part here, second here).

Melinda Quintos de Jesus, executive director of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR), also discussed the values Kovach and Rosenstiel discussed in the book for the April 2008 issue of the PJR Reports (which I wrote about earlier). In covering the current political crisis in the Philippines, she wrote, a review of basic principles may help clarify the role of the press. Since the CMFR site is currently undergoing some platform and design changes, I suggest you read Ma’am Melinda’s piece in this cached page here.

I am also planning to write more about the elements of journalism in future posts. For now, let me just agree with Roy Peter Clark of The Poynter Institute when he said this about Kovach and Rosenstiel’s book: “The most important book on the relationship of journalism and democracy published in the last fifty years.”